If your phones are ringing, your calendar is full, and your marketing reports look great — but your bank account isn’t growing — you’re not alone.
Most business owners don’t lose money because marketing “doesn’t work.”
They lose money because they chose a marketing pricing model that looked fair on paper — without having the systems to see what actually converts.
In Video Two of our marketing series, we break down the most common pricing models used by marketing agencies and lead vendors, and what really happens once real money, real leads, and real sales teams are involved.
We use a very simple lens:
Money goes out to marketing. Money should come back into the bank account.
If that loop isn’t clear, measurable, and visible — marketing becomes guesswork.
Below are the 10 most common marketing pricing models, explained from a business owner’s point of view, with real-world examples that show the gap between the promise and the reality.
You pay a fixed monthly fee for ongoing marketing services.
The promise:
A long-term partner who consistently works on your marketing — strategy, execution, optimization, and support.
When it works:
You get stable campaigns, steady improvement, and real growth over time.
Where it breaks:
Many businesses pay month after month without being able to answer one simple question:
What revenue did this actually produce?
When results aren’t clearly tied to revenue inside your CRM, retainers can slowly turn into background expenses instead of intentional investments.
You pay for each lead delivered — form fills, calls, messages, or inquiries.
The promise:
“No leads, no payment.”
The hidden problem:
Not all leads are equal.
Very quickly, businesses start asking:
What counts as a real lead?
What’s junk, duplicate, or fake?
Which leads actually turn into customers?
🚨 Reality Check: High lead volume without conversion data is just noise.
One real example involved a large radio campaign. Phones rang nonstop. Leads poured in. The sales team was doubled to handle the volume.
Once proper CRM tracking was implemented, the truth was revealed:
Only 0.5% of those leads became paying customers.
After ad spend and payroll, the campaign was a massive loss — even though it looked like success on the surface.
Instead of leads, vendors book meetings directly on your calendar.
The promise:
“I only pay when I actually talk to someone.”
The reality:
Appointments don’t automatically mean qualified prospects.
In real cases, calendars were full — but prospects showed up expecting:
Discounts that didn’t exist
Free offers that were never promised
Deals the company never agreed to
The result?
Confused conversations
Frustrated prospects
Bad reviews
Very few real opportunities
On paper, it looked productive. In reality, it created activity without alignment.
You only pay when someone actually shows up to the meeting.
Why it sounds safer:
No-shows don’t cost you money.
Where it gets messy:
This model introduces trust and tracking issues:
What counts as a “show”?
What if they’re late?
What if it’s a short call?
Without crystal-clear CRM definitions, this model often turns into arguments instead of partnerships.
The vendor takes a percentage of revenue or profit generated.
The promise:
Perfect alignment — if you win, they win.
The tension:
This model creates discomfort on both sides.
Business owners must expose sensitive CRM and revenue data
Vendors depend on full transparency to get paid
One side feels exposed.
The other feels vulnerable.
Without strong systems and clear agreements, trust becomes difficult to maintain — especially for small and mid-sized businesses.
You pay upfront to build the system, then pay based on performance.
The logic:
Real systems require real work and real cost.
The risk:
Once the setup fee is paid, your leverage drops.
In one real case, a business paid a $1,500 setup fee for a “qualified appointment” campaign. The setup was completed, but meaningful performance never followed.
The setup was paid.
The time was invested.
The results never materialized.
This is the trap: The performance promise sounds great — until the setup cost becomes sunk risk.
A short test period with minimal risk.
The promise:
“Let’s test it and see.”
What actually happens:
Because the commitment feels low:
Vendors don’t fully commit
Businesses don’t fully commit
Tracking stays incomplete
The test ends without ever being measured properly — and everyone walks away unsure what actually happened.
Pay a fixed amount and receive guaranteed outcomes.
The promise:
Certainty and accountability.
The catch:
This model is only as strong as:
Your definitions
Your tracking
Your CRM data
If “qualified appointment” isn’t clearly defined and recorded, guarantees quickly become disputes.
Starts performance-based… then quietly converts into a retainer.
This often happens after:
A few good months
Early momentum
Reduced oversight
One day, you realize you’re paying a retainer — but not getting the same performance you once did.
This is one of the most common ways marketing budgets quietly drift out of control.
A partner promotes your offer to their audience and gets paid per lead or sale.
When it works:
This can be extremely powerful if the partner is trusted, aligned, and credible.
What still matters:
Clear attribution, tracking, and CRM visibility.
Every marketing pricing model shifts risk and responsibility in a different way.
None of these models are “bad.”
Every one of them can hurt you if:
You don’t understand what you’re signing
You don’t have proper systems
You can’t see real revenue outcomes
In Video Three, we’ll cover:
The biggest mistakes business owners make
How to choose the right pricing model for your business
How to protect yourself using CRM and tracking systems
So you’re never again stuck in a deal that looks good on paper — but quietly drains your bank account.
👉 Continue the series on our YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@smallbusinessautomation